(a) In deciding what A should have done to avoid foreseeable harm to B, it is not relevant that A is a qualified accountant. A defendant's particular skill and knowledge does not affect the standard of care owed.
(b) In deciding what A should have done to avoid foreseeable harm to B, it is relevant that A is a qualified accountant. A defendant who professes particular skill and knowledge may be held to a higher standard of care owed than an ordinary person.
|