1 (b). You said that this agreement is not an unsolicited consumer agreement.
That's wrong. This agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement because:
It involves the supply of either goods or services to a consumer by a dealer. A dealer is a person who enters into negotiations with a consumer with a view to making an agreement for the supply of goods or services, even if they are not the actual supplier.
The negotiations were conducted either by telephone, or at a place that was not the supplier's place of business.
The consumer did not invite the dealer to visit them for the purposes of supplying the goods or services in question.
The total price to be paid by the consumer under the agreement is either more than $100; or cannot be ascertained at the time the transaction was entered into.
These elements are laid down in s 69 of the ACL. They are all satisfied on the facts given in the example.
In particular, Bob qualifies as a 'dealer' because he is a person who enters into negotiations with a consumer with a view to making an agreement for the supply of goods or services, even if he is not himself the actual supplier.