First Principles of Business Law
Quiz: Remedies for breach of contract

Question 4

 

 

 

Which one of the listed cases is authority for the statement that damages for breach of contract have the objective of putting the non-defaulting party in the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed?

(a)   Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1933) 176 CLR 344

(b)   Dougan  v Ley & another (1946) 71 CLR 142

(c)    Holland & another v Wiltshire (1954) 90 CLR 409

(d)    Radford v de Froberville [1978] 1 All ER 33

(e)    Steele v Tardiani (1946) 72 CLR 386

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Go to the next question Quit the quiz Choose another module