That's wrong. 

You were asked to select the case that illustrates the effect of the parol evidence rule when it is applied.

LG Thorne & Co Pty Ltd v Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd (1956) SR  (NSW) 81  is the correct case.

None of the other cases listed are concerned with this issue.

Give yourself no marks for this answer.

Go to the next question...