Case Summary

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256

Contract; formation: consideration; offer and acceptance.

Facts: During an influenza epidemic in England in 1891 the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company produced patented 'smoke balls' made from certain chemicals. The company marketed these smoke balls as an effective means of preventing influenza. In particular, the company published an advertisement in a newspaper, offering to pay a reward of £100 to anyone who purchased the smoke balls, used them according to the instructions provided, but who nevertheless caught influenza. To demonstrate the seriousness of their offer, the company deposited £1000 in a bank account from which to pay the rewards. Elizabeth Carlill saw the advertisement. She bought and used a smoke ball as directed. When she nevertheless caught influenza she claimed the £100 reward promised by the company. The company refused to pay her, denying that an enforceable contract with Carlill had been created in these circumstances.

The case raised various issues.

Issue 3: Acceptance by conduct.  Since Carlill had never communicated directly with the company before catching influenza, how had she accepted the company's offer of the reward?

Decision: Carlill had accepted the company's offer by doing the acts of buying and using the smoke ball.

Reason: The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company had, in their advertisement, made a promise to pay a £100 reward to any person who caught influenza after buying and using the smoke ball in the manner directed. Carlill had performed the required acts after reading the advertisement and in response to that promise. Her acts were therefore sufficient acceptance to bring about an enforceable agreement with the company.